• Home
    • About
  • Services
    • Party wall
    • Injunction
    • Expert Witness
  • Areas we cover
    • South Essex
    • North Essex
    • East London
    • Other Areas
  • Contact
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
Antino and Associates
  • Home
    • About
  • Services
    • Party wall
    • Injunction
    • Expert Witness
  • Areas we cover
    • South Essex
    • North Essex
    • East London
    • Other Areas
  • Contact
  • Testimonials
  • Blog

Blogs

Party Wall Surveyor, Philip Antino, submits winning submission

25/7/2018

 

Front and rear extension rejected - Thorley Hill

The owners of No. 1a Thorley Hill, Bishops Stortford, Hertfordshire, CM23 3ND submitted an application to East Herts Council for front and rear extensions under planning application 3/18/0899/HH.

​This incorporated a two storey front extension and a single rear extension.  The owners of No. 1 Thorley Hill were concerned that this would have a detrimental effect on their property and their quiet enjoyment of their house. They instructed, party wall surveyor, Philip Antino to carry out a detailed assessment of the local authority planning and national planning policy framework policies, the site, the proposed works and to provide advice.

​Mr Antino’s findings were such that he believed that there were justified grounds to register objections with East Herts Council opposing the proposed development, particularly the double storey front extension which was within a matter of several metres of No. 1 Thorley Hill.

It was further of notable concern to Mr Antino that No. 1a Thorley Hill had already been extended substantively to the side with double storey extensions and to the rear, increasing the original footprint by some 350%.

Upon consideration of the relevant factors and the East Herts local plan 2007 policies EMV1, EMV5 and EMV6 together with the national planning policy framework submissions were made to the East Herts Council in the following terms.

The proposed front extension by reason of its scale, sighting and design would cause unacceptable harm to the amenity use of No. 1 Thorley Hill which would result in a significant loss of light and create an overbearing effect for the occupiers of No. 1 Thorley Hill.  The proposed extension, by reason of its scale, sighting and design would cause unacceptable harm to the character and design of the surrounding street scene. 
Imaged with the word 'rejected' in red font
​The council took into account the representations made by Mr Antino on behalf of his clients and reached the decision having full regard to those representations, the development plan and all material considerations that the planning application should be refused for terms as clearly set out and submitted by Mr Antino on behalf of his clients.

The Council accepted Mr Antino’s submissions and rejected the application.

If your neighbour has submitted building plans that you oppose, contact the party wall surveyors at Antino and Associates.


    Archives

    April 2022
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018

    Categories

    All
    Client Questions
    Disputes
    Home Extension
    Party Wall Act
    Party Wall Agreement
    Party Wall Notice
    Party Wall Surveyor
    Planning Permission
    Planning Rejection
    Tree Preservation

    RSS Feed

Antino & Associates
Suite 2
Axis House
The Street
Chelmsford
​CM2 8PW


Party Wall Surveyors serving the UK


Hours

M-F: 8am - 5pm

Telephone

01245 490 019

Email

enquiries@antinoandassociates.com
Copyright © 2018 Antino & Associates
All rights reserved. Data Policy.

Website developers Essex 
Perfect Layout Digital Marketing
  • Home
    • About
  • Services
    • Party wall
    • Injunction
    • Expert Witness
  • Areas we cover
    • South Essex
    • North Essex
    • East London
    • Other Areas
  • Contact
  • Testimonials
  • Blog